DISC Logo

Citizen Attitudes Toward Taxes
Page 1. Page 2. Page 3.

(Original Deck 3)


Question Number Column
Number
Variable Name Variable Label Question Text Values/Value Labels
  161-164   Identification number    
Q37 165 UFEESREC Change in user fees for recreational facilities. Some people feel that Wisconsin should make more use of 'user' charges. This would reduce the taxes now paid by all residents of Wisconsin. Others disagree. Would you strongly favor, favor, oppose, or strongly oppose increased user fees for recreation -- for park permits, fishing licenses, boat licenses, etc. 1. Strongly favor
2. Favor
3. Oppose
4. Strongly oppose
5. Depends
7. Don't know
9. Not ascertained
Q38 166 UFEESSAN Change in user fees for sanitation. Would you strongly favor, favor, oppose, or strongly oppose user fees for sanitation--for garbage and street sweeping. 1. Strongly favor
2. Favor
3. Oppose
4. Strongly oppose
5. Depends
7. Don't know
9. Not ascertained
Q39 167 UFEESVEH Change in user fees on vehicles. Would you strongly favor, favor, oppose, or strongly oppose additional license and fuel taxes to cover the costs associated with using trucks and automobiles. 1. Strongly favor
2. Favor
3. Oppose
4. Strongly oppose
5. Depends
7. Don't know
9. Not ascertained
Q40 168-169 UFEESGV1 What government services should be financed by user fees. What other governmental services--if any--do you feel should be financed with user charges or higher user charges than now.
1st response
Type of Service Reason
00. Other services (MOC)
01. Roads, tollroads, trucking and transportation
02. Recreation (hunting, boating fishing)
03. City sanitation, gargage, sewerage
04. Education, higher education
Type of User
30. Other users (MOC)
31. Out-of-state road users-NSF
32. Out-of-state recreation users
33. Tax-exempt organizations should pay for municipal services -- sewer, water
34. More taxes on sin-liquor, beer, tobacco, luxuries
35. More taxes on non-residents
69. None
77. Don't know
99. Not ascertained
Q40 170-171 UFEESGV2 What government services should be financed by user fees. What other governmental services--if any--do you feel should be financed with user charges or higher user charges than now.
2nd response
Type of Service Reason
00. Other services (MOC)
01. Roads, tollroads, trucking and transportation
02. Recreation (hunting, boating fishing)
03. City sanitation, gargage, sewerage
04. Education, higher education
Type of User
30. Other users (MOC)
31. Out-of-state road users-NSF
32. Out-of-state recreation users
33. Tax-exempt organizations should pay for municipal services -- sewer, water
34. More taxes on sin-liquor, beer, tobacco, luxuries
35. More taxes on non-residents
69. None
77. Don't know
99. Not ascertained
Q41 172-173 TSURPLUS What should government do with budget surplus. When the state of Wisconsin collects more tax money than it has budgeted to spend, would you prefer that this money be used to supply better state services, returned to help local governments reduce property taxes, or that the money be repaid directly to the taxpayer, or what. 00. Other (MOC)
01. Services
02. Returned locally
03. Repaid directly
04. Reduce taxes in the next year/use in next budget
05. Reduce debt or earn interest on surplus
06. Combinations - 01 + 02, 01 + 03, All three, 01 - 03
77. Don't know
99. Not ascertained
Q42 174 TDLOCSTT Distribution of taxes between local and state governments. The Wisconsin legislature has made an effort to reduce property taxes by shifting some of this tax burden from the local level to the state. Are you familiar with any of the things the state has done in this regard. 1. Yes
2. Depends
3. No (Code 8 in Cols. 175-176)
7. Don't know (Code 8 in Cols. 175-176)
9. Not ascertained
Q42A 175-176 TDPROG State programs to redistribute taxes from local level. What do you remember being done by the state. 00. Other (MOC)
01. Increased aid to schools, welfare
02. GPTR, tax credits to communities
03. M+E exemption, state assessment of manufacturing property, aid to business
04. Highway, sewer construction aid
77. Don't know
88. Inap. No. Don't know to Q42
99. Not ascertained
Q43 177 TDPPSTT Preferences for reducing property and increasing state taxes. How do you feel about efforts to reduce property taxes and make up the difference by increasing state taxes. 1. Strongly approve
2. Approve
3. Depends
4. Disapprove (Code 8 in Col. 18)
5. Strongly disapprove (Code 8 in Col. 18)
7. Don't know (Code 8 in Col 18)
9. Not ascertained
Q43A 178 LOCCTRL1 Local government control on spending. Would you still feel this way if reduced property taxes meant that your local government had less control over how it spends its money. 1. Yes
2. Depends
3. No
7. Don't know
8. Inap, disapprove, strongly disapprove, don't know to Q43
9. Not ascertained
Q44 179 TDLOCSRV Preferences on reducing property tax by cutting local services. To what extent do you approve or disapprove of reducing property taxes by cutting local services... 1. Strongly approve
2. Approve
3. Depends
4. Disapprove (Code 8 in Cols. 180-183)
5. Strongly disapprove (Code 8 in Cols. 180-183)
7. Don't know (Code 8 in Cols. 180-183)
9. Not ascertained
Q44A 180-181 LOCSRV1 Which local services would you cut. Which local services should be cut.
1st Response
Roads-Transportation
00. Other roads (MOC)
01. Street maintenance
02. Snow plowing, salting, street cleaning
03. City bus service
04. Road construction
Sanitation
10. Other sanitation (MOC)
11. Garbage collection (cut garbage men)
12. Sewerage in small towns
13. Sanitation
Human Services
20. Other human services (MOC)
21. Human services - welfare
Security
30. Other security
31. Police protection
32. Fire services
Education
40. Other education (MOC)
41. K-12 education (cut teacher aids)
42. Libraries, museums
43. School bus service
Recreation
50. Other recreation (MOC)
51. Parks
52. Recreation programs
53. Tree maintenance
General Cuts
60. Other general cuts (MOC)
61. Cuts in personnel, NFS
62. Cut in administrative personnel, cut overhead
63. Percentage cut of all services
64. Cut out waste, NFS
Other
77. Don't know
79. Don't get any local services now
88. Inap, disapprove, strongly disapprove, don't know to Q44
99. Not ascertained
Q44A 182-183 LOCSRV2 Which local services would you cut. Which local services should be cut.
2nd Response
Roads-Transportation
00. Other roads (MOC)
01. Street maintenance
02. Snow plowing, salting, street cleaning
03. City bus service
04. Road construction
Sanitation
10. Other sanitation (MOC)
11. Garbage collection (cut garbage men)
12. Sewerage in small towns
13. Sanitation
Human Services
20. Other human services (MOC)
21. Human services - welfare
Security
30. Other security
31. Police protection
32. Fire services
Education
40. Other education (MOC)
41. K-12 education (cut teacher aids)
42. Libraries, museums
43. School bus service
Recreation
50. Other recreation (MOC)
51. Parks
52. Recreation programs
53. Tree maintenance
General Cuts
60. Other general cuts (MOC)
61. Cuts in personnel, NFS
62. Cut in administrative personnel, cut overhead
63. Percentage cut of all services
64. Cut out waste, NFS
Other
77. Don't know
79. Don't get any local services now
88. Inap, disapprove, strongly disapprove, don't know to Q44
99. Not ascertained
Q45 184 TDPPY Reduce property tax but increase income tax. The state could increase aid to local schools as a way of reducing property taxes, but this would mean an increase in the state income tax. Would you strongly approve of this, approve, disapprove, or strongly disapprove. 1. Strongly approve
2. Approve
3. Depends
4. Disapprove (Code 8 in Col. 185)
5. Strongly disapprove (Code 8 in Col. 185)
7. Don't know (Code 8 in Col. 185)
9. Not ascertained
Q45A 185 LOCCTRL2 Local government control on school expenditures. Would you still feel this way if increased state aid were to prevent your local schools from starting a special program the schools felt was needed. 1. Yes
2. Depends
3. No
7. Don't know
8. Inap, disapprove, strongly disapprove, don't know to Q45
9. Not ascertained
Q46 186 XPENDLMT Expenditure limit on government spending. The state now limits increases in spending by school districts and local government. Do you feel this is a very good idea, good, bad, or very bad. 1. Very good
2. Good
3. Bad
4. Very bad
5. Depends
7. Don't know
9. Not ascertained
Q47 187 TCLIMATE Tax climate for business. How do you think Wisconsin's overall tax climate for business and industry now compares with most other states... 1. Much better
2. Better
3. Same
4. Worse
5. Much worse
7. Don't know
9. Not ascertained
Q48 188 TDINDUST Reducing industry's share of taxes. Taxes in Wisconsin could also be changed by reducing the share of taxes paid by business or industry and increasing the amount paid by families and individuals. Would you strongly approve of this, approve, disapprove, or strongly disapprove. 1. Strongly approve (Code 8 in Col. 189)
2. Approve (Code 8 in Col. 189)
3. Depends
4. Disapprove
5. Strongly disapprove
7. Don't know (Code 8 in Col. 189)
9. Not ascertained
Q48A 189 TDJOBS Preferences if tax redistribution created jobs. Would you feel the same way if reduced property and income taxes on business or industry would make new jobs in Wisconsin. 1. Yes
2. Depends
3. No
7. Don't know
8. Inap, strongly approve, approve, don't know
9. Not ascertained
Q49 190 TDUNJOBS Should industry get reduced taxes for creation of jobs. Do you believe business and industry should or should not get reduced taxes for new jobs they create. 1. Should
2. Depends
3. Should not
7. Don't know
9. Not ascertained
Q50 191 TDSLPPYD Lowering sales, income and property. All in all, if you were able to lower just one of the taxes paid by Wisconsin residents, would you lower property taxes, sales taxes, or the state personal income tax. 1. Property tax
2. Sales
3. Income tax
7. Don't know
9. Not ascertained
Q51 192 TDSLPPYU Raising either sales, income or property taxes. Now, if you had to raise just one of the taxes paid by Wisconin residents, would you raise property taxes, sales taxes, or the state personal income tax. 1. Property tax
2. Sales
3. Income tax
7. Don't know
9. Not ascertained
Q52 193 TFAMMOVE Movement of families due to tax levels. Some people say that families are leaving Wisconsin because of high taxes here. Others disagree. How important do you think this problem is... 1. Very important
2. Important
3. Unimportant
4. Very unimportant
7. Don't know
9. Not ascertained
Q53 194 TRELMOVE Friends or relatives who moved in response to taxes. Have any of your friends or relatives left Wisconsin primarily because of high taxes. 1. Yes
2. No (Code 8 in Cols. 195-197)
9. Not ascertained
Q53A 195 TCPLAIN1 Which type of taxes did they complain about most. Which taxes did they complain about most.
1st response
0. Other (MOC)
1. Property tax
2. Income tax, NFS
3. Sales tax
4. Corporate/Business taxes
5. Inheritance taxes
6. Taxes too high generally
8. Inap, no to Q53
9. Not ascertained
Q53A 196 TCPLAIN2 Which type of taxes did they complain about most. Which taxes did they complain about most.
2nd response
0. Other (MOC)
1. Property tax
2. Income tax, NFS
3. Sales tax
4. Corporate/Business taxes
5. Inheritance taxes
6. Taxes too high generally
8. Inap, no to Q53
9. Not ascertained
Q53A 197 TCPLAIN3 Which type of taxes did they complain about most. Which taxes did they complain about most.
3rd response
0. Other (MOC)
1. Property tax
2. Income tax, NFS
3. Sales tax
4. Corporate/Business taxes
5. Inheritance taxes
6. Taxes too high generally
8. Inap, no to Q53
9. Not ascertained
Q54 198-199 TREFIDE1 Tax reform ideas. As I indicated before the interview started, this survey is sponsorted by the state's tax reform commission. In addition to what you've told me, what other ideas about state and local taxes -- if any -- would you like the commission to consider.
1st Response
Reduce Spending
00. Other reduce spending (MOC)
01. Eliminate unnecessary programs - general
02. Reduce waste, inefficiency - general
03. Reduce welfare
04. Reduce other programs - specific mentioned
Reduces Taxes - General Answers
10. Other reduce taxes (MOC)
11. Lower all taxes
12. Lower school taxes
13. Eliminate major state tax source - sales or income tax completely
14. Reduce property taxes
15. Reduce income tax
16. Reduce sales tax
Raise Taxes - User Fees - General
20. Other raise taxes (MOC)
21. Sales tax
22. Gasoline tax
23. Tollroads
24. Raise taxes on business
25. Legalize lotteries, gambling
Fairness Related Reasons - Tax Reform
30. Other fairness (MOC)
31. Eliminate loopholes for wealthy
32. Make tax system progressive - tax rates should rise as a percentage of income
33. Help families with children
34. Uniformity of property tax assessments
35. Equity between owners and renters
36. Equity for older people vs. younger people, more help for the elderly
37. Help low-income groups
38. Business taxes too high
Miscellaneous
50. Other miscellaneous (MOC)
51. Tax simplification reasons
Increase Spending, Funding for Specific Programs
60. Other
61. Education/Special Education
69. None
User Charges
70. Raise user charges
71. Lower user charges
77. Don't know
99. Not ascertained
Q54 200-201 TREFIDE2 Tax reform ideas. As I indicated before the interview started, this survey is sponsorted by the state's tax reform commission. In addition to what you've told me, what other ideas about state and local taxes -- if any -- would you like the commission to consider.
2nd Response
Reduce Spending
00. Other reduce spending (MOC)
01. Eliminate unnecessary programs - general
02. Reduce waste, inefficiency - general
03. Reduce welfare
04. Reduce other programs - specific mentioned
Reduces Taxes - General Answers
10. Other reduce taxes (MOC)
11. Lower all taxes
12. Lower school taxes
13. Eliminate major state tax source - sales or income tax completely
14. Reduce property taxes
15. Reduce income tax
16. Reduce sales tax
Raise Taxes - User Fees - General
20. Other raise taxes (MOC)
21. Sales tax
22. Gasoline tax
23. Tollroads
24. Raise taxes on business
25. Legalize lotteries, gambling
Fairness Related Reasons - Tax Reform
30. Other fairness (MOC)
31. Eliminate loopholes for wealthy
32. Make tax system progressive - tax rates should rise as a percentage of income
33. Help families with children
34. Uniformity of property tax assessments
35. Equity between owners and renters
36. Equity for older people vs. younger people, more help for the elderly
37. Help low-income groups
38. Business taxes too high
Miscellaneous
50. Other miscellaneous (MOC)
51. Tax simplification reasons
Increase Spending, Funding for Specific Programs
60. Other
61. Education/Special Education
69. None
User Charges
70. Raise user charges
71. Lower user charges
77. Don't know
99. Not ascertained
Q55 202-203 AGE AGE Only a few background questions remain... First, what is your present age. 18. 18 years old
19. 19 years old
etc..
89. 89 years or more
99. Not ascertained
Q56
Q56A
204-205 EDUCATN Highest Education What is the highest grade of school or year of college you finished.
or
What is the highest college degree -- if any -- you earned.
00. None
01. First grade
02. Second grade
03. Third grade
04. Fourth grade
05. Fifth grade
06. Sixth grade
07. Seventh grade
08. Eighth grade
11. Nineth grade
12. Tenth grade
13. Eleventh grade
21. High school graduate
31. 1 year college
32. 2 years college
33. 3 years college
34. 4 years college
41. College graduate
51. Some post grad work
52. MS or equivalent
53. MD or equivalent
61. Ph.D
99. Not ascertained
Q57 206 NOCHILD Number of children under 18. How many children under 18years of age live there. 1. 1 child
2. 2 children
etc.
8. 8 or more children
9. Not ascertained
Q58 207 NOADULT Number of adults. Including yourself, how many persons 18 or older live there. 1. 1 person
2. 2 persons
etc.
8. 8 persons or more
9. Not ascertained
Q59 208-209 YRSRESWI Years lived in Wisconsin. How many years have you lived in Wisconsin. 00. Less than 1 year
01. 1-1.9 years
02. 2-2.9 years
etc.
79. 79 years or more
88. All life
99. Not ascertained
Q60
Q62
210-214   Cities, villages and towns in Wisconsin. What is the name of the city, village, or town or township in which you now live.
or
In what county to you live.
Wisconsin Department Of Administration Code
See geocodes.tsv for list
(.TSV "Tab Separated Values")
Q60 215 TOWNCTY Population size. Name of town, city, or village lived in: population size. 1. Under 2500
2. 2500-9999
3. 10,000-24,999
4. 25,000-49,000
5. 50,000-99,999
6. 100,000-249,999 (Madison)
7. 250,000-999,999 (Milwaukee)
9. Not ascertained
Q61 216-217 YRSRES Number of years lived in town, city or village. How many years have you lived in this place. 00. Less than 1 year
01. 1-1.9 years
02. 2-2.9 years
etc.
79. 79 years or more
88. All life
99. Not ascertained
Q63 218-219 JOBTITLE Occupation. What is your occupation. 00. Professional, Technical and kindred workers
01. Farmer
02. Managers, officials, proprietors, except farm
03. Clerical and kindred workers
04. Sales workers
05. Craftsmen, foremen and kindred workers (skilled workers)
06. Operatives and kindred workers (semi-skilled workers)
07. Private household and service workers
08. Laborers
69. Not employed (Code 8 in Col. 220)
99. Not ascertained
Q63A 220 SELFEMP1 Self-employed or employee, employement status. Do you work for someone else as an employee, are you self-employed, or what. 0. Other (MOC)
1. Employee
2. Self-employed
8. Inap, not employed to Q63
9. Not ascertained
Q64 221 MARITAL Maritial Status. Are you married, separated, widowed, divorced or have you never married. 1. Married
2. Separated (Code 8 in Cols. 62-67)
3. Widowed (Code 8 in Cols. 62-67)
4. Divorced (Code 8 in Cols. 62-67)
5. Never married (Code 8 in Cols. 222-227)
9. Not ascertained
Q64A 222-223 SPOUSJOB Occupation of spouse. What is your spouse's occupation. 00. Professional, Technical and kindred workers
01. Farmer
02. Managers, officials, proprietors, except farm
03. Clerical and kindred workers
04. Sales workers
05. Craftsmen, foremen and kindred workers (skilled workers)
06. Operatives and kindred workers (semi-skilled workers)
07. Private household and service workers
08. Laborers
69. Not employed (Code 8 in Col. 224)
88. Inap, separated, widowed, divorced, never married to Q64
99. Not ascertained
Q64B 224 SELFEMP2 Employment status of spouse. Does (he/she) work for someone else as an employee, is (he/she) self-employed, or what. 0. Other (MOC)
1. Employee
2. Self-employed
8. Inap, separated, widowed, divorced, never married to Q64A
9. Not ascertained
Q64C 225-227 YFAMDIV Division of family income About what percentage of your total family income was provided by your spouse. 001. 1-1.9 Percent
002. 2-2.9 Percent
etc.
100. 100 Percent
777. Don't know
888. Inap, separated, widowed, divorced, never married to Q64
999. Not ascertained
Q65 228-229 YSTATUS Income staus. In 1977, was your total family income less than... 01. Less than $6000
02. $6000-8999
03. $9000-11,999
04. $12,000-14,999
05. $15,000-17,999
06. $18,000-20,999
07. $21,000-24,999
08. $25,000-39,999
09. $40,000 or over
99. Not ascertained
  230   Sex of respondent. Sex of respondent. 1. Male
2. Female
9. Not ascertained
  231-233   Total number of minutes. Total number of minutes the interview took. 001. 1 minute
002. 2 minutes
etc.
085. 85 minutes
180. 180 minutes (3 hours)
999. Not ascertained
  234-235 BLANK      
  236 Card Number     1. (Constant)
  237-240 Project Number     1121. (Constant)

 

Go to Previous Page.

Go to First Page.

Go to Main WisTax Archive Page.


Email: disc@mailplus.wisc.edu

Last updated 13 May, 2002.

©2009 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.
If you have trouble accessing this page, please contact disc@mailplus.wisc.edu.